For decades, if you wanted a divorce in Australia, you had to prove your spouse was to blame. No-fault divorce was not legal by local law.
The grounds ranged from habitual drunkenness to adultery, and many cases involved the use of private investigators. Some couples who privately agreed to separate would even have to stage adulterous trysts for later evidential use in court. This all changed in 1975 with the introduction of “no-fault divorce” and the Family Court system. Family law in Australia has come under intense scrutiny since then, with dozens of reports — including a 2019 Australian Law Reform Commission review — and more than 100 amendments to the Family Law Act. This year it will be examined again, in a joint parliamentary committee inquiry chaired by Kevin Andrews. So how did we get here? A ‘Moralistic Approach’: 1959-1975 Marriage and divorce remained state matters for most of the 20th century. But in 1959, then Attorney-General Sir Garfield Barwick introduced a federal law: the Matrimonial Causes Bill, stipulating 14 grounds for divorce. This included desertion, adultery, habitual drunkenness, cruelty, insanity, and imprisonment. “You’d hire a private investigator to spy on your spouse,” says Shurlee Swain, an Emeritus Professor at the Australian Catholic University. “He would hang around outside the house … and then when the light went out in the bedroom he’d then knock on the door and burst in with his camera and take pictures of the couple in the compromising position.” The pictures would then be used in court as evidence of adultery. This desire to “punish” a party by attributing blame to the “sinner” was deeply rooted in religious principles underpinning marriage at the time. “It’s a very moralistic approach to marriage and one that by the middle of the 20th century was out of sync with the vast majority of the population,” Professor Swain says. The Push for Reform: 1960s-1975 With cultural and social change sweeping Australia in the 1960s, our conception of marriage also changed. “There was a shift towards viewing marriage as a loving relationship,” explains Henry Kha, a law lecturer at Macquarie University. “Moreover, there was a rise in de facto relationships … more and more people felt that marriage was no longer essential in order to affirm a relationship.” The Whitlam government, in power from 1972, proposed a series of social reforms — including laws regulating divorce and parental custody. The notion of no-fault divorce had support from an eclectic range of organizations, including divorce lawyers — who framed marriage as a contractual obligation both parties should be able to exit equally — and the Divorce Law Reform Association. Professor Swain says that association “sounds neutral” — but wasn’t. “It was in fact what we now recognize pretty much as a men’s rights group,” she says. “What they were resentful about was the amount of money going from husbands to ex-wives that they thought should be coming into their families.” But not everybody was in favor of a no-fault system. “There is also a great amount of fear that women will be short-changed by it because the vast majority of women still at this stage are not in full-time employment, and so marriage has been their career,” Professor Swain says. “So there’s a great push from feminist groups to be cautious about how you introduce the law and how you protect women who are likely to be damaged by it. “They expressed this fear, that if the no-fault divorce goes through as it’s proposed, that women will be left high and dry and men will just be able to move freely from one marriage to another.” No-fault Divorce: 1975 In 1975, the government passed the Family Law Act with a firm majority: 80-41 votes. The law introduced, for the first time, no-fault divorce. It also established a federal court to deal with family law issues. “Family law was viewed as run by very strict doctrinal principles that didn’t really take into consideration the psychological and social consequences of a breakdown of a relationship,” Dr. Kha says. “The aim of the Family Law Act was to remedy those problems by introducing a Family Court of Australia that would not only deal with legal issues but provide counselling services.” In the first year, the law was implemented, there was a surge in divorces in Australia. “The courts are completely overwhelmed from their opening day,” Professor Swain says. “There are these huge queues of people because there is this great pent-up demand of people who actually were no longer living together who wanted to get a divorce but had not been able to do it under the previous situation.” It won’t save you from the cost of divorce. While press coverage of this upswing tended towards the alarmist, she explains, the number of divorces “flattened out” after a few years. For some, the idea that no-fault divorce would bring about less acrimony was not realized. “Right from the beginning the expectations of people that people could be civilized is contradicted by the way they in fact act,” Professor Swain says. “It’s a minority. The bulk of people don’t do that, they don’t go to court, they take advantage of it and all is well. “But it’s that group that does end up in the court, that does end up in disputed decisions, that builds the image of the law and the court as a failure.” Read more: Top Tips for Coping During Separation and Divorce The Need for More Reform? 1976-present Since its implementation, the family law system has been the subject of dozens of inquiries and amendments. Patrick Parkinson, the Dean of Law at the University of Queensland, says when considering family law reform, it’s important to remember that the Family Court deals with much more than just marital disputes. The University of Queensland “It’s essential that you start with the proposition that disproportionately we are dealing with violence, abuse, mental illness, and drug and alcohol abuse,” he says. “If you understand that then you can probably understand that the adversarial system and decision-making by lawyers, many of whom have commercial law backgrounds, is not fit for purpose for dealing with those sorts of issues.” Australian children are being placed in harm’s way by the legal structure designed to determine their best interests — the family law system. Instead, Professor Parkinson argues for decision-makers who are more equipped to deal with issues like mental illness. “At least for self-represented litigants, there should be a multidisciplinary panel consisting of a lawyer, a psychologist or psychiatrist, a third person who might be a drug and alcohol expert or domestic violence expert or something of that kind,” he says. In 2017, the Turnbull government asked the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) to conduct the first comprehensive review of the Family Law Act. The ALRC received more than 1,200 written contributions, says its principal legal officer, Micheil Paton. Mr. Paton says the major concerns raised were in relation to:
“Recommendation number one was that states and territories should establish specialist family law courts, as already exists in Western Australia, and that ultimately federal family courts like the Family Court of Australia should be abolished,” Mr. Paton says. “So in a sense, reversing the effect of the Family Law Act 1975, which created this one national court.” Mr. Paton says the primary reason for the recommendation is the “incredible increase” in family violence cases and child protection issues. Family and domestic violence support services: InTouch Multicultural Centre Against Family Violence: 1800 755 988 1800 Respect national helpline: 1800 737 732 Women’s Crisis Line: 1800 811 811 Men’s Referral Service: 1300 766 491 Lifeline (24-hour crisis line): 131 114 Relationships Australia: 1300 364 277 “In 1974, when the Act was being designed, family violence hardly rated a mention by the politicians who were establishing it and the documents that were explaining the reasoning for the new law,” he says. “Family law was seen as a private dispute between two people who needed to sort out some arrangements and couldn’t agree.” The Federal Government has yet to formally respond to the ALRC report. However, in the same year, the Prime Minister announced another wide-ranging inquiry into the family law system. It will be carried out by a committee of politicians from both houses of parliament, including One Nation leader Pauline Hanson — a move that attracted criticism from anti-violence campaigner Rosie Batty. Many are waiting to see the outcome of the inquiry, due in October this year. “In an ideal world, we’d set up various structures that meant that nobody needed to go to court, that they could sort it out through a long process of mediation,” Professor Swain says. “But we don’t live in an ideal world, so I suspect the battle is going to keep going on.” Read Source Article For more information or to discuss your situation, please contact us on 1800 662 535 for a FREE 20-minute consultation. We have Qualified and Experienced Family Lawyers Brisbane at James Noble Law. Find Brisbane family law lawyers on Google Maps near you. For more information, please visit the main article source: No Fault Divorce
0 Comments
Bankruptcy Act 1996 and Family Law Act 1975 – AustLII and Divorce Loopholes
Under the bankruptcy act 1966 law, creditors are unable to claim against a person’s estate if that person has declared bankruptcy. However, there are certain situations where the bankruptcy act 1966 can be orchestrated to appear this way, so as to purposely avoid paying debts. Calls for Divorce Loophole Crackdown: Criminals Skirting the Law The recent case involving Michael Williamson, disgraced former Health Services Union Boss, highlights how divorce and family law proceedings can be fraudulently utilized to avoid creditors. In the case of Michael Williamson, who has signed a settlement with HSU for the recovery of $5,000,000.00 stolen from the corporation, the circumstances appear suspicious. The Australian revealed this week that Michael Williamson, divorced and bankrupt, was seen with his ex-wife at her beachfront property, an asset which was gifted to her by Williamson prior to his jail time. Importantly, during Divorce Proceedings, Williamson claimed assets of only $20,000.00 and a fishing boat, with the, remained of his real property, assets, and $1.6M in superannuation being transferred to his ex-wife. Due to his bankruptcy, and Family Law Rules regarding superannuation transfer, creditors of HSU were unable to recover any assets which had been transferred to the wife. This strategy of “asset dumping” has become increasingly popular amongst criminals. To combat these dealings and fraudulent transactions, there has been a push by legal professionals and judges alike for creditors to begin bringing applications under section 79 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). These applications would allow the Court to set aside Orders where “there has been a miscarriage of justice or where the Court considers it appropriate”. This means creditors could bring an application under this section of the Family Law Act to have the divorce proceedings set aside, in circumstances where the parties “feign” separation in an attempt to mislead creditors. Whilst this would be a step in the right direction, the hardest part would be for creditors to sufficiently prove that the parties were knowingly fraudulent, which may prove difficult under current provisions. If you need any help, To discuss your situation and the options that are available to you, contact the team at James Noble Law today for expert advice from experienced Brisbane solicitors for a FREE 20-minute consultation. We have Qualified and Experienced Family Lawyers Brisbane at James Noble Law. Find Brisbane family lawyers on Google Maps near you now. You may also like to know about Family Court Portal Learn more information, visit our website: Bankruptcy Act 1966 Going through separation and the divorce process can be stressful on so many levels. That’s why it’s imperative you really make an effort to look after your health throughout the entires.
How to survive the divorce process Getting sick or rundown is not going to help when you are facing the divorce process, so here are a few tips to stay mindful of as you strive to close this major chapter of your life. #1 – Take Time Out for Yourself Lives are busy as it is and made even busier when finalising a separation or preparing for the divorce process. Don’t forget to take some time out each day and just allow yourself to breathe, relax, and unwind. It’ll help you to think clearer and make better decisions, as well as alleviate a lot of the stress attached to the situation. #2 – Watch What You Eat Some of us are prone to binge eating when we’re feeling stressed and depressed, while others just don’t really feel like eating anything at all. Not only do we need to eat during this phase, but eat properly and maintain a balanced and healthy diet. Adding copious amounts of alcohol into the mix is not going to help get through the divorce process, either. #3 – Get Regular Exercise A healthy body leads to a more positive and healthy mindset. You don’t have to push weights at the gym every day. Even a daily brisk walk can do wonders for your health, metabolism, and your outlook on life. Don’t remain stagnant. Get out and get moving. #4 – You Need Sleep Sleep is normally one of the areas of life that can be affected the most when we go through stressful situations or life changes. In some cases, a person might just want to sleep all the time, but generally, it’s a total lack of sleep that causes the problem. Lying awake at night dwelling on the problems isn’t going to provide a solution. Switch off the brain and leave thinking about your problems until the morning. Following the 3 steps above will help you sleep better at night. James Noble Law Is Here To Help You Through The Divorce ProcessYou don’t have to go it alone throughout the separation and divorce process. James Noble Law has many years of expertise handling all elements of the separation and divorce process. We not only help you with the legal side of the process, but we’re also sympathetic to your situation as well. Give us a call today to arrange an appointment with one of our experienced team members. If you need any help please contact the Brisbane Family Lawyers team today for a FREE, no-obligation 20-minute consultation. For more information, please visit the main article source - (here keyword and link of the article) https://jamesnoblelaw.com.au/healthy-divorce-process/ Find Divorce and Family law attorney Brisbane on Google Maps now. https://g.page/brisbanefamilylaw?share Are you separated under one roof? If you and your partner are contemplating a divorce, you have also most likely considered living separately during the process.
Although it is a requirement for you and your partner to be separated for a minimum of 12 months prior to filing an Application for Divorce, there is no requirement for the parties to reside separately after the difficult decision to separate has been made. What is separated under one roof? It is extremely common for parties who have separated but living together under the same roof, even if it is only for a short period of time. This is known as being ‘separated under one roof’. This blog will explain why it is important to prove that you and your partner are separated dispute living under one roof. Why Do Separate Parties Remain Under One Roof? Even in the most amicable situations separation is difficult for both parties, particularly if there are children of the relationship. There are several reasons as to why separated parties remain living together in the short-term including: Maintaining Stability for children – If there are children from the marriage, particularly younger children, a parent moving out of the former matrimonial home might be rather difficult for the children and or both parents. The adjustment period and the distribution of parents separating may all be too much for the children and for that reason, many separated parties continue to reside together to provide some stability in the interim period. In many cases this assists the parties in reaching a resolution about the future parenting responsibilities for each parent and making a decision with respect to where the children will live and how much time the children will spend with each parent; Financial reasons – Whilst the parties are figuring out the financial aspect of the separation, it is common that one or neither of the parties can afford to pay rent or a mortgage on their own, and for that reason, many couples continue living together until a property settlement has occurred; (learn more about divorce and property settlement) and Convenience – A family home is often chosen because it’s close to work, school, family, and friends and for this reason, it’s convenient for parties to live together and maintain their normal routine until final arrangements can be made. Don’t forget to read 4 Key Points To Note About Property Settlement and Australian divorce law property settlement Proving that You are Separated Under One Roof? If you and your partner decide that it is best for your circumstances to continue to live together under the same roof, apart from the 12-month separation period, when submitting your Application for Divorce you will need to provide the Court an Affidavit which deposes a change in your marriage, whether this is sudden or gradual, and which evidenced the fact that while you and your partner remained living together, you and your spouse have still in fact, separated. The Court may request you file an Affidavit of a third party (or parties) to provide evidence that you and your partner have separated. It is important that your Affidavit sets out why you continued to live together following your separation and evidence that although a physical separation has not occurred, there has been a breakdown in the relationship, and it is unlikely that your relationship will resume. This can include: Changes to the financial aspects of your relationship – For example, if any or all joint accounts have been closed, you and your partner begin opening and using separate bank accounts and a change in the responsibility of payment of liabilities. Changes to the nature of the household – This includes setting out the facts that you may no longer share a bedroom, cook separate meals or complete household chores separate from one another. Changes to the social aspects – This includes providing evidence as to if or when you and your partner told family and friends of the relationship breakdown and you were no longer treat as a couple; The absence of a sexual relationship; and If or what government departments, you or your partner have advised of your separation. If you and your partner are contemplating separating, please contact us on 1800 662 535 for a free 20-minute consultation. We have Qualified and Experienced Brisbane Family Lawyers at James Noble Law. Find Brisbane family law lawyers on Google Maps now. https://g.page/brisbanefamilylaw?share Article Source: Separated Under One Roof If you and your Husband or Wife have been separated for more than 12 months, then you can apply for a divorce in Australia to end the marriage.
If for any period of the 12 months of separation you and your former partner were living together separated under one roof, then you will need to file an affidavit explaining the circumstances to the Court and confirming that you and your former partner were separated at the time by providing evidence such as – not eating meals together, not socialising together, telling other people and family members about the separation and so forth. If there are children under the age of 18 and the matter is not a Joint Application for a Divorce (i.e. with both parties making such Application), then a personal appearance at the Divorce Hearing will be required. If there are no children under the age of 18, then no appearance at the Divorce Hearing will be required. If the Court is satisfied that the parties have been separated for 12 months, they will grant the Divorce Order. The physical Divorce Order will then issue in one month and one days’ time and this is when the Divorce becomes legal. Remember, you can settle financial and children’s matters from the day of separation. You do not need to wait until you apply for a divorce in Australia. Learn more about Considering Separation To obtain a Divorce and legally end your marriage, contact the team at James Noble Law to Make an Appointment today. Article Source: Apply For A Divorce In Australia Separation and divorce can be very difficult and onerous times in both parties’ lives. Typically, the breakdown of a partnership or “separation” occurs when the relationship has been brought to an end by the action or conduct of one or both parties.
Although separation is not clearly defined under the legislation, the Family Law Court normally considers the effect the following three elements:
Applications for divorce are filed in the Federal Circuit Court (Family Court). For an application for a divorce, there must be a separation between the parties of the relationship. Under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), a marriage has irretrievably broken down when the Court is satisfied that a couple has lived separately and apart for at least 12 months, and, the marriage has broken down to such an extent that it is unlikely that the parties would get back together. Accordingly, the parties must have been separated for a continuous period of not less than 12 months immediately preceding the date of the filing of the application, and, satisfy the Court that there is not a reasonable likelihood of cohabitation being resumed. Although the Court must be satisfied that the parties have lived separately and apart for at least 12 months, it is not necessary that the parties move residence. Parties may continue to reside in the same residence as the other party. Physical separation is neither necessary nor a sufficient condition for separation. An application for a divorce order is based solely on the ground that the relationship has broken down irretrievably. The concept of “separate under one roof” is not uncommon between married couples who live separately but continue residing under one roof. The parties continuing to reside in the same household is not an impediment to filing for a divorce, provided the parties’ matrimonial relationship has been effectively severed, and, the parties have separated pursuant to the terms of the legislation. To satisfy the Court of the abovementioned requirements, the couple will need to provide witness evidence or other such proof that they no longer share the same bed, do household chores together or socialise with one another. This evidence is commonly executed by an independent person who sets out their views on the relationship of the parties, which assist’s the Court to corroborate any statements made in the application for divorce. If all the essential qualities of common life have gone, the parties can be said to have separated. If the parties to a marriage re-commence the relationship after a divorce application has been filed, or the Court forms the opinion that there is a reasonable likelihood the parties will resume cohabitation, the Court will not order a divorce or make a divorce order under section 48(3) of the Family Law Act. The legislation permits separated couples are able to resume cohabitation for a period of up to, but not including, three months without affecting any prior period of separation for the purpose of the 12-month separation period required for a divorce. If such a resumption of a relationship occurs and the parties again separate, they can include the period of separation prior to that resumption of the relationship as being part of the 12-month separation period required. The Procedure Required To Withdraw The Divorce Application: The procedure required to withdraw the divorce application before the Court is known as a “Notice of Discontinuance”, a document used to discontinue your application, response, or notice of appeal or withdraw part of your case. Importantly, if one party files a notice of discontinuance, this does not prevent the other party from continuing to seek the orders they have sought, including orders for costs. If the next court listing for your matter is not vacated even after you have lodged the Notice of discontinuance, it is in your best interest to attend that event so that no Court Orders are made in your absence. If the parties have been married for a period of less than two years, they are required to consider reconciliation, with the assistance of either a family or child counselor before either party can file an application for their divorce. If there are children of the relationship who have not attained the age of 18 years, a divorce order cannot be made by the Court until the Court has been satisfied that proper arrangements have been made for the child’s welfare or that the divorce order should be made, notwithstanding that the Court is not satisfied that the proper welfare considerations have applied. Since the implementation of the Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Act 2017, factors such as sex and gender no longer affect Australian marriage rights, with same-sex marriage now legal amongst all states and territories. These changes altered the existing Marriage Act 1961, redefining marriage to be ‘the union of two people to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life. Marriages involving couples of the same-sex are recognised with Australian divorce proceedings, regardless of whether the marriage was solemnised prior to amendments affect. A couple within this category whose foreign same-sex marriage is recognised in Australia, is unable to marry again in this jurisdiction, unless there are questions of validity of the previous marriage. However, Same-sex couples are not prevented from holding other ceremonies, such as confirmation of vows or recommitment. This also encompasses same-sex couple who marry and divorce overseas. Same-sex couple who divorce either in Australia or overseas after 9 December 2017 are recognised within the Australian jurisdiction under the same process and circumstances as all other married couples. Divorce proceedings are governed by the principles of the Family Law Act 1975, which establish “no-fault” divorces. This means the Family Court will not consider the circumstances as to why the marriage ended, rather the reasonable likelihood the parties will not get back together. Like any divorce proceeding in Australia, same-sex couples must have lived separately and apart for at least 12 months and one day. Importantly, it is possible for you and your spouse to be separated whilst living under one roof but requires proof of separation during this time. If there is a child of the marriage aged under 18 years old, the Court will only grant the divorce if satisfied proper arrangements have been made to accommodate the child’s needs. However, if there are no children of the marriage aged under 18 years, there is no requirement to attend the court hearing of the divorce from either sole or joint applications. Once a divorce application is filed with the Court, the applicant (being the party who filed the application) must deliver to the other party a notification that the marriage has ceased. This delivery may be undertaken by any person over the age of 18 years, or a professional process server who has authority to serve the other party. This process does not have to be undertaken by you personally. The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) requires the correct procedure to be undertaken when delivering the divorce application to the other party. If these requirements are not met, it can cause significant delays and additional procedural costs. It is common for people to use a professional process server (or person to serve the document) to avoid any procedural defects. Importantly, the application for divorce must be served to the other person directly and in person. If the other party refuses to accept the document or does not wish to acknowledge the divorce, the server may place the document down in their presence and state:
Once proof of service has been established, the serve must complete a sworn affidavit stating the time, date and place of service in front of either a Justice of the Peace or a solicitor. If the other party does not refuse service, they may sign an acknowledgment that they have been served. If the application for divorce is made on behalf of both parties and there are no children under the age of 18 who are involved in the matter, there is no requirement for the parties to attend court proceedings for the divorce. If you do choose to attend, a quick hearing is held by the Court which dissolves the marriage. Sometimes after the breakdown of a marriage, one party has difficulty in accepting this fact and may refuse to sign divorce papers. Other situations might involve a controlling ex-partner or parties who believe they will get back together. For whatever reason, if the other party is refusing to sign divorce papers, you do not need to obtain their permission or consent to file an application for divorce. Often in Hollywood movies and TV shows you see one party “refusing” to sign the divorce papers. This myth does not exist in Australia, where one party is unable to unnecessarily delay or complicate divorce proceedings. Fraudulently Into A Legal Marriage If the parties fraudulently entered into a legal marriage, an application may be brought before the Court for a declaration of nullity. The Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) provides on what grounds a party may apply for a decree of nullity. Effectively, this is an order finding that declares the original marriage invalid on the following grounds: 1. One or both of the parties to the marriage were already married at the time; 2. One of both of the parties were under-age and did not have necessary approval; or 3. One of both of the parties were forced into the marriage under duress. 4. One party was mistaken as to the identity of who they were marrying; 5. One party was mistaken as to the nature of the ceremony; or 6. One party was mentally incapable or understanding the effect of the marriage. The Court will not declare a marriage invalid on the grounds of: 1. Non-consummation of the marriage; 2. Never having lived together; 3. Family violence; or 4. Other incompatibility situations. To apply for a decree of nullity, you must file an Initiating Application in addition to an affidavit which sets out the facts relied on to have the marriage annulled, and, details of the type of marriage ceremony performed. If you were in a relationship with another person, but were not legally married, you may still fall under the definition of “de facto” relationship. This term is defined in Section 4AA of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). To meet this definition, the law requires that you and your former partner (regardless of sex and gender) had a relationship as a couple who were living together on a genuine domestic basis. Although an application for divorce is not necessary in situations involving de facto couples (as there is no marriage to nullify), both the Family Court and Federal Circuit Court have the power to hear financial, property and parenting issues of these relationships. If you have been separated for more than 12 months from your former matrimonial partner, there are few opportunities to oppose a divorce application. You can only oppose the divorce where: 1. There has not been 12 months separation as alleged in the application; or 2. The Court does not have jurisdiction to hear the matter. If you do not wish to have the divorce order granted by the Court, you must complete and file a Response to Divorce and appear in person on the hearing date. This Response requires you to set out the grounds on which you seek to have the divorce proceeding dismissed. If you do not attend the divorce hearing, the Court may decide to permit the divorce application in your absence. If it is difficult for you to attend Court in person due to work or other circumstances (such as traveling overseas or interstate), you may ask the Court to appear by telephone. If the divorce application has errors, you need to outline the disagreed facts in the Response to Divorce. Some common errors may be dates of birth or other significant dates of the relationship, incorrect details regarding children, or circumstances of the marriage. If you wish to file a Response, this document needs to be served on the other party within 28 days of the application for divorce being served upon you, or, 42 days of the application for divorce being served upon you if you were served outside of Australia. If you have opposed the application with a Response to Divorce, you must appear in person on the hearing date. The granting of a divorce order does not decide issues regarding property, spousal maintenance or parenting arrangements of any children. If you wish for the Court to make orders regarding these issues, you can: 1. Make arrangements known as ‘Consent Orders’ and file it with the Court; or 2. Seek Orders from the Court in cases where no agreement can be reached. If you are planning on re-marrying in the near future, you should avoid making set plans until the divorce order has been finalized. However, you may complete and lodge a Notice of Intended Marriage with an authorized celebrant before a divorce order is finalised. This process must occur one month prior to the date the marriage is to be solemnised. You will require the authorised celebrant to sight a copy of the divorce order before the wedding can take place. Usually, a divorce order takes affect one month and one day after the divorce is granted by the Court. Accordingly, you should not assume the divorce will be granted at the first Court hearing. If you have been married for less than two years, you will be required to file a counselling certificate. To obtain this certificate, you will need to attend counselling sessions with your partner. If you are unable to attend counselling with your partner, you will be required to file an affidavit as to the reasons why. The two years are calculated from the date of marriage to the date of applying to the Court for divorce. If you were married overseas, you are able to apply for a divorce in Australia provided you or your spouse: 1. Regard Australia as your home and intend to live indefinitely in Australia are an Australian citizen or resident; or 2. Are an Australia citizen or resident; or 3. Are an Australian citizen by birth or descent; or 4. Are an Australian citizen by grant of Australian citizenship; or 5. Ordinarily live in Australia and have done so for 12 months immediately before filing for divorce. You must provide the Court with a copy of your marriage certificate. If your marriage certificate is not in English, you need to file an English translation of it, and, an affidavit from the translator. As the dissolution of a marriage is typically the entrance point of many other family law issues such as division of property and assets, parenting arrangements and consent orders, please seek legal advice on your situation and how to proceed. If you require legal advice, please contact one of our accredited family law specialists on 1800 662 535 or email us at [email protected] Article Source: Separation And Divorce What Happens If My Ex Won’t Sign the Divorce Papers?
Divorce can be a very difficult time in both parties’ lives. But here you can find a better solution for Online Divorce Application. Sometimes after the breakdown of a marriage, one party has difficulty in accepting this fact and may refuse to sign divorce papers. Other situations might involve a controlling ex-partner or parties who believe they will get back together. For whatever reason, if the other party is refusing to sign divorce papers, you have options. Under the Family Law Act 1975, marriage has irretrievably broken down when the Court is satisfied that a couple has lived separately and apart for at least 12 months, and, the marriage has broken down to such an extent that it is unlikely that they would get back together. Importantly, the Court will not Grant a Divorce under Section 48(3) of the Family Law Act if there is a likelihood that the parties will resume cohabitation in the near future. Further, if a separated couple attempts to reconcile their marriage and fails for a period of three months, the 12-month requirement will commence from the time following the 3 months. Separate Under One Roof It is not uncommon for a married couple to separate but continue living under one roof. To satisfy the court of the abovementioned requirements, the couple will need to provide witness evidence or other such proof that they no longer share the same bed, do household chores together or socialize with one another. Online Divorce Application Form An application for Divorce form can be obtained from either the Family or Federal Magistrates Court. This application can then be filed once the parties have been separated for more than 12 months. Either party may file the application, and, do so regardless of the wishes of the other party. Importantly, if the totality of the marriage lasted less than 2 years, the parties are required to attend to a counselor to attempt reconciliation before an application for divorce can be filed with the Court. If Already Fixed Your Mind For Separation, Fill This Online Divorce Application Form Service of Online divorce application on Other Party Once an Online divorce application is filed with the Court, the applicant (being the party who filed the application) must deliver to the other party a notification that the marriage has ceased. This may be undertaken by any person over the age of 18 years, or a professional process server who is allowed to serve the other party. This process does not have to be undertaken by you personally. The application must be served to the other person directly. Importantly, if the other party refuses to accept the document, or does not wish to acknowledge the divorce, the server may place the document down in their presence and state:
Once proof of service has been established, the server must complete a sworn affidavit stating the time, date, and place of service in front of either a Justice of the Peace or a solicitor. If the other party does not refuse service, they may sign an acknowledgment that they have been served. Divorce Application Hearings If the application for divorce is made on behalf of both parties, and there are no children under the age of 18 who are involved in the matter, there is no requirement for the parties to attend court proceedings for the divorce. If you do choose to attend, a quick hearing is held by the Court which dissolves the marriage. As the dissolution of a marriage is typically the entrance point of many other family law issues such as division of property and assets, parenting arrangements, and consent orders, please seek legal advice on your situation and how to proceed. If you require legal advice, please contact one of our accredited Family Law Specialists on 1800 662 535 or email us at [email protected] Article Source: Online Divorce Application Divorce Property Settlements, De facto Property Settlement, or Same-Sex Couple Property Settlement
Divorce Property Settlements issues like Financial issues arising from the breakdown in a relationship can be resolved at any time following the date of separation. In family law, this is known as a “property settlement”. Divorce is dealt with in separate proceedings. The requirement to obtain a divorce in Australia is that an ‘irretrievable breakdown of the marriage/relationship has occurred, in the case of a marriage a 12-month separation with no likelihood of reconciliation is required before an application for divorce can be made. The fault that led to the marriage breakdown is not relevant. The divorce application will not resolve issues relating to children or property. These are dealt with in separate applications. The divorce application details arrangements for the care of dependent children. Relationship Property Settlement A property settlement includes dealing with and dividing all of the property of the relationship such as houses, cars, shares, superannuation, liabilities (mortgage, credit cards), and financial resources (eg. family trusts). The property, liabilities, and financial resources of the relationship can be in joint names, your name only, or your spouse’s name only. The Court assesses all contributions financial or otherwise. The Court is also required to consider the “future factors” which include amongst other things –
The relevant sections of the legislation in regard to Divorce Property Settlements are set in the Family Law Act 1975. There are alternate means of resolution. Mediation and collaborative practice may provide assistance with you to negotiate this settlement. If by negotiation you cannot resolve the division of your assets then an application can be made to the Family or Federal Circuit Court to obtain a judgment on the division of such assets. The Family Court has the power to deal with financial issues arising from a breakdown in a relationship Pursuant to Section 79 of the Family Law Act, a Court may make such orders as it considers appropriate, altering the interests of the parties to a relationship, including an order for settlement of property in substitution for any interest that a party may have in that property and may make an order for the benefit of either or both of the parties or a child of the relationship in such a manner as the Court determines is appropriate. Divorce Property Settlements (Including De Facto And Same-Sex Relationship) Court Orders In considering what order, if any, should be made, the Court takes into account:
The court will look at the commitments of each of the parties that are necessary to enable the party to support himself or herself or a child of the relationship, or some other person. Party Eligibility The court will take into account the eligibility of either party for a pension, for a Commonwealth pension, or benefit under any superannuation fund or scheme. The court will look at the standard of living which in all the circumstances is reasonable for a party to the relationship. The court will also determine what financial support should be provided to a party to enable that party to undertake a course of education or training, which would enable that party to financially establish himself or herself in a business or otherwise to enable that party to obtain an adequate income. The court applies a 4-step approach in giving consideration to making orders in regard to the division of the net matrimonial assets of the parties to a relationship after eligibility is considered and approved. The 4-step approach involves:
In determining what is just and equitable, the court will consider whether the proposed orders to be made by the Court require adjustment for a fair and equitable division of the net matrimonial assets of the parties. There Are Two Approaches To Property Division Of The Net Matrimonial Assets:
The Global Approach Most matters dealt with in the Family Courts are done on the global approach. This is considered when all the assets and liabilities (including superannuation) are grouped into a single pool and then split according to a Court ruling. The Asset-By-Asset Approach The court may decide a matter on an asset-by-asset approach when:
What is property to be divided under the Family Law Act? The property is defined as being the property of the parties to a relationship, which the parties or a party is entitled to, whether held in possession or reversion. Property has always been given a very wide meaning by the Courts. The following matters are relevant:
Valuation of a property to determine its value for the purpose of a financial division of the net matrimonial assets. The parties can normally determine the value of a certain property, being the property of the net matrimonial pool. However, where the valuations cannot be agreed upon, the Court will require that valuations be obtained on each item of property by registered valuers or persons qualified to give such valuations. Where business, corporations, or partnership values are required, there are a number of methods of carrying out such evaluations. Normally accountants are engaged for this purpose. In certain circumstances, monies may be set aside for the benefit of other family members – for example, children’s loan accounts are the vested property of the children and are legitimate accounting entities that are unassailable by the parties in a divorce property settlements. Loan accounts are payable at call and can be called upon by the children when he/she obtains adulthood. Further, the custodian of the child can call for payment during the child’s minority. In such circumstances, the court will not treat the children’s loan accounts as part of the matrimonial assets to be divided between the parties. In other circumstances, a party may not have a realizable value in an investment. For example, a party’s minority interest in a corporate entity such that the party’s lack of control in such entity may mean that his or her shareholding in that entity has no value. Divorce Property Settlements (Including De Facto And Same-Sex Property) Financial Contributions The court has a duty to assess the contributions of the parties during the relationship. This includes:
The direct financial contribution to the purchase of a property may be offset by other factors such as care of children and the duration of the relationship. Financial contributions to the acquisition of a property are given greater importance to other contributions in short relationships. Initial financial contributions by the parties at the commencement or beginning of their relationship. Divorce Property Settlements The Courts will initially make a determination of the division of the net matrimonial assets taking into account the initial financial contributions made by the parties prior to or at the commencement of their relationship. The longer the duration of the marriage, depending on the quality and extent of the initial financial contribution, the more proportionality the original contribution is eroded. The erosion of the value of the initial financial contribution is not by the passage of time, but by the offsetting contributions of the other party. The time at which a financial contribution is made is very relevant. For example, if it is made at the commencement of a long relationship, it is likely to be treated differently than if made near the end of the long relationship. The value of the contribution is more significant if made towards the end of the long relationship. Financial contributions in a short relationship (for example, a relationship less than five years) are given great consideration by the Court. If there has not been an intermingling of the assets and the ownership of such assets by the parties in a short relationship, then the Courts would normally determine that the parties retain the assets they brought into the relationship, including their superannuation entitlements, and also if there was limited joint ownership of property acquired during the relationship, then such property would be divided in accordance with the parties’ actual financial contributions to the acquisition of such property. Post-separation contributions. Post-separation contributions, either financial or otherwise, are taken into account by the Court when determining the parties’ respective interests in the net matrimonial assets. For example, an inheritance received after separation may be excluded from the matrimonial asset pool, in which case, the party who did not make such a contribution would have no interest in such an asset. Adjustments will be made by the Court to reflect the value of the post-separation contributions made by the parties. Contributions to the welfare of the family. The Court takes into account the contributions made directly or indirectly by a party to a relationship, including the contribution by way of homemaker or parent. Such contributions may offset the financial contribution made by a party by way of being the income earner in the relationship. The future financial positions of the parties and their standard of living. The court, when determining the division of the net matrimonial assets, takes into account the future financial positions of the parties and makes judgments accordingly. The relevant provisions are set out in section 75(2) of the Family Law Act. There are equivalent provisions in the de facto legislation. The considerations to be given by the court are set out previously. The court will make appropriate adjustments to the division of the net matrimonial assets taking these factors into account. Just and equitable division. After taking all of the above-mentioned matters into consideration, the court can make a further adjustment to the division of the net matrimonial assets to ensure a just and equitable division of the assets in all circumstances. Article Source: Divorce Property Settlements Bankruptcy Act 1996 and Family Law Act 1975 – AustLII and Divorce Loopholes
Under the bankruptcy act 1966 law, creditors are unable to claim against a person’s estate if that person has declared bankruptcy. However, there are certain situations where the bankruptcy act can be orchestrated to appear this way, so as to purposely avoid paying debts. Calls for Divorce Loophole Crackdown: Criminals Skirting the Law The recent case involving Michael Williamson, disgraced former Health Services Union Boss, highlights how divorce and family law proceedings can be fraudulently utilized to avoid creditors. In the case of Michael Williamson, who has signed a settlement with HSU for the recovery of $5,000,000.00 stolen from the corporation, the circumstances appear suspicious. The Australian revealed this week that Michael Williamson, divorced and bankrupt, was seen with his ex-wife at her beachfront property, an asset which was gifted to her by Williamson prior to his jail time. Importantly, during Divorce Proceedings, Williamson claimed assets of only $20,000.00 and a fishing boat, with the, remained of his real property, assets, and $1.6M in superannuation being transferred to his ex-wife. Due to his bankruptcy, and Family Law Rules regarding superannuation transfer, creditors of HSU were unable to recover any assets which had been transferred to the wife. This strategy of “asset dumping” has become increasingly popular amongst criminals. To combat these dealings and fraudulent transactions, there has been a push by legal professionals and judges alike for creditors to begin bringing applications under section 79 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). These applications would allow the Court to set aside Orders where “there has been a miscarriage of justice or where the Court considers it appropriate”. This means creditors could bring an application under this section of the Family Law Act to have the divorce proceedings set aside, in circumstances where the parties “feign” separation in an attempt to mislead creditors. Whilst this would be a step in the right direction, the hardest part would be for creditors to sufficiently prove that the parties were knowingly fraudulent, which may prove difficult under current provisions. Article Source: Bankruptcy Act “Australian divorce law property settlement“, says A breakdown of a relationship can be one of the hardest times in a person’s life. During this time, individuals often undergo immense changes to routine, living environments, and lifestyle. In the midst of grieving, possibly moving to a new residence, organizing your affairs, and trying to get your life back on track, it’s easy to forget some of the smaller things that can have a drastic legal impact on your estate. Remembering to update your enduring power of attorney and will to reflect your new situation is vitally important to protect your estate and assets, ensuring that in the unlikely event of an accident, your property does not pass to your ex-partner. Enduring Power of Attorney on “Australian divorce law property settlement” An Enduring Power of Attorney or “EPA” is a document that provides another person with certain powers in the event you lose the mental capacity to make decisions. Hypothetically, if you were involved in an accident where you suffered serious brain damage or were in a coma, you would likely lose the capacity to make financial and other important decisions. In this situation, if you signed an EPA which gave your now ex-partner power of attorney, they would be able to control your assets and make decisions on your behalf. Wills and Intestacy If you were party to a serious relationship or marriage and have a will, chances are this document reflects your wishes for your estate to be left with your ex-partner. Even if this will does not leave property to your ex-partner, it may allocate them to be an executor or “administrator” of the estate, which would essentially place them in charge of the distribution of property. Depending on your relationship with your ex-partner, this could create several unnecessary problems for your family or children. Consequently, it is important to construct a new will following the breakdown of a marriage or relationship to reflect your current position, ensuring your property is safeguarded. For those thinking, “I don’t have a will, my ex won’t be able to do anything”, think again. In Queensland, the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 outline in the event a person becomes deceased without a valid will, the rules of intestacy will apply. In these events, the Court may grant Letters of Administration to a surviving spouse (which includes de facto partners) as a priority. This means, your ex-partner has priority to your property and assets in the event you pass away without a valid will. These intestacy rules specifically allocate $150,000.00 + household chattels + one-half or one- third of the estate’s residence to the spouse or de facto partner. This could mean your ex-partner receives a very large portion of your estate, even taking priority over your children. If you are seeking advice regarding divorce and family law proceedings, please let us know if your enduring power of attorney or will requires updating as well. Call us today on 1800 662 535 or email your queries at [email protected] to find out how our team of accredited family law specialists can finalize your family law matter to ensure your wills and the estate is protected. Visit Article Source - “Australian divorce law property settlement” |
Categories
All
|